Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus White


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Marcus White
Who is this guy he is not a football player — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey 2006 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment: This AfD was created and edited by the above user and not listed at AfD; I've now listed it. No vote. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 00:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

* Speedy keep per related nominations, and endorse speedy closure with a few more speedy keep votes. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Abstain. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 06:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * EXTRA STRONG SPEEDY KEEP nominator of AfD is a vandal, nuff said. M o e   ε  01:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Verify and keep: and the unsourced template. Wait a week. Then come back for deletion if it is still unsourced. --CyclePat 02:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Capitalistroadster 03:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Why is this a speedy keep when it seems to be about a non-notable PHD student who is a member of a band of questionable notability The Special Patrol Group? --Martyman- (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possible speedy. This is an article about a student who plays for a Aussie rock group who I doubt meets WP:NMG. I suspect the people voting keep think are discussing the NFL player. No Google hits at all for "Marcus White" "Special Patrol Group"..
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- --Martyman- (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't really see anyone looking for an article on this guy anyway. I could be wrong.  Check back in 20 years.  Jim62sch 04:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ter e nce Ong 04:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 06:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete seems non notable member of questionably notable band ...maelgwntalk 10:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per maelgwn Sliggy 14:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable! TVXPert 14:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Intentions and credentials of nominator not relevant. Ncsaint 17:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Martyman -- Ruby  18:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Googling for the name plus the supposed claim to fame yields precisely zero hits. Guy 18:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing here worth keeping. VirtualSteve 21:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN. Cnwb 22:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, note that the keep votes are because of the nominator --Jaranda wat's sup 02:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't particularly care, I was actually brought here by a vote recruiter. Cyde Weys  06:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 04:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Roisterer 08:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.