Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcy Blum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this seems clear enough to not continue (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  20:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Marcy Blum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim of significant notability; fails WP:GNG. NOTE: Editors may wish to also review previous versions; recent rollback due to copyvio concerns. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 23:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm leaning toward keep.  Here's some coverage I found:  from The New York Observer,  from The New York Sun,  from New York, and  from People (a profile from 1976).  Also, she was selected "Best Wedding Planner" by New York magazine in 2001.  The Wikipedia article claimed 2005, too, but I can't find that at nymag.com.  There are also some hits on Google Books, such as  from New York and some archived hits from The New York Times Magazine, but Google Books doesn't have a preview for them.  The coverage is heavily slanted toward New York media, especially New York magazine, but these are not small publications.  Some of these articles are a bit short, and I found a few more that were even shorter, but I think it's probably enough to demonstrate notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I believe this should be kept. She was also named as one of the world's best wedding planners by Vogue, "" and Harper's Bazaar ""  GummyBears2014 (talk)  16:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC) — Gummybears2014 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep - The article needs work, but the People and The New York Sun references that NinjaRobotPirate found contain sufficient biographical information to construct a decent biography, and satisfy WP:GNG when combined with available paragraphs from the various other independent reliable sources cited.


 * The lists of soft news and talk shows does not strike me as encyclopedia-worthy. To borrow a name from her client list, Billy Joel has no doubt appeared on many similar infotainment programs, but we don't list them in his biography because they aren't why Joel is notable. They aren't defining, they're just part of celebrity. Similarly, rather than speling out every publication that has run an article to which she contributed, summarize the topics she has written about and type of publications (e.g. bridal, lifestyle) she has written for, unless she was a regular columnist for one or more of them. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. There is quite a significant amount of coverage of her. The king of the sun (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as per .--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.