Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marek Michalak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Kei lana (recall) 22:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Marek Michalak

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete: NON-NOTABILITY. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 19:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions.   —Phil Bridger (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - AfD created for all the wrong reasons by a one-day puppet. All this article needs is to add some references, which are plenty on the net, not an AfD. Wrong template, subject notable beyond any doubt. greg park avenue (talk) 17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, I am not a "one-day puppet". greg park avenue made no effort to contact me. As a Polish-American I know his reasoning re Michalak is inaccurate, however we all have a right to be wrong sometimes. But his assailing me as a puppet is a clear violation of WP:AGF. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I beg your pardon for my poor English. Of course, instead of "puppet" (Pol. marionetka) supposed to be "sock puppet" (Pol. kominiarka). Sorry for your inconvinience, my hyphen-Am bro, didn't mean any personal offense. greg park avenue (talk) 01:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The article is it stands now is non-encyclopaedic for numerous reasons, the most important being a lack of references and links, as you yourself acknowledge. Calling me names is juvenile and foolish and will do you no good. If you feel so strongly about keeping the article, you should fix it. If you can I will ask to have the AfD closed without prejudice. So far the AfD is not objectionable to anyone besides you. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 03:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * 107 GHits under the search name: Marek.Michalak pedagog alone. Will do? I don't have to add references just because you AfDed this article for no apparent reason. Change the prod then maybe I do, don't promise although. greg park avenue (talk) 04:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board informed. This usually works better than project deletion sorting. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 16:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * There are not 107 Google hits (ghits) - they are Netscape hits and all from Polish URLS. I don't read or speak Polish, regretfully, except for a few bad words. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nihil novi (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:VOTE Visor (talk) 22:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Per arguments of Yellow-bellied sapsucker, above. This article now reads like a vanity piece:  too long, and unsourced.  Nihil novi (talk) 23:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. Not a single source has been given (reliable or otherwise), but the article is loaded with personal mementoes! The corresponding article in Polish is even more extreme. Please consult Conflict of interest for further guidance. I would suggest deleting and rewriting the article from scratch as a stub based on what's available online, minus Mirrors and forks. Note, there’s a Polish jazz musician by the same name, a pedagogue, also listed in search. --Poeticbent  talk  17:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.