Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mareva Arnaud Tchong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 17:36, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Mareva Arnaud Tchong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. The article is entirely reliant upon a primary source and an unreliable source, and source searches are providing no better. North America1000 16:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Even if the Community of Christ publication listed could be seen as a indepdent enough source, the fact we have not an article at all but an interview means that we have on the not even one source that could be seen as adding toward passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The only source I could find, besides the interview, were the two articles on the 'Tahiti Infos' site, one of which only mentions her name in a list of others. Gilded Snail (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete---Primary source is not in any way, shape, or form a reliable source and I can't seem much to justify inclusion in the google searches. -- Church  Talk 21:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.