Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Adamson (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  01:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Margaret Adamson
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Bilateral relations, Cambodia, Pakistan, Poland,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The article was very stub-y so I did some work filling it out using the references that were there. Someone with better access to Australian sources can probably improve this even more. Lamona (talk) 03:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: A high office multiple diplomat professionally is notable. I disagree this doesn't meets WP:GNG as the nominator said. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't see anything resembling a HEY. Only two sentences has been added. Geschichte (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.