Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margherita d'Este


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Margherita d'Este

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Sourced entirely to one online genealogical self-published website. DrKay (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Italy. DrKay (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * At least there are sources. Some pages have no sources so I don’t understand why you’d put it up for deletion. YorkDr (talk) 12:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Some pages have no sources See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Having other problematic pages is not a valid reason to keep another one that has issues of its own. Each article is evaluated based on its own merit. Also, lack of sources in an article is not necessarily equal to lack of notability, if one can demonstrate that significant coverage of the subject in secondary reliable sources does exist. This is what you should be doing with regards to this page. Keivan.f  Talk 14:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete - Sorry! I have tried to find details about her life both offline and online; however, I couldn't find any information. Nevertheless, if kept, Italian editors interested in history may come across sources. Therefore, I leave it for them. 1.47.128.24 (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don't think WP:NOTGENEALOGY applies to families like hers. People in her position were public figures. The sourcing may not be great, but is enough to know she existed. Deletion serves no useful purpose. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Royaltycruft, fails GNG and NBIO. Notability is not inherited and nothing indicates this individual was notable in themselves or did anything of significance. The article is part genealogy (much of it unsourced) and part royaltycruft memorial.  // Timothy :: talk  15:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.