Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margie Warrell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Margie Warrell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Very little in-depth coverage from any sort of reliable independent source and lots of promotional fluff. JTtheOG (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, News media,  and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per WP:HEY. It's an unusual use of HEY I know-- I significantly edited the page in an attempt to save it because she has notoriety as a speaker, but after significant research (via Google, Newsbank and WikiLibrary) I found very few RSs. Possibly there's a weak case for WP:AUTHOR, but given the lack of sources I could find I think I would vote delete.
 * Delete. At initial glance I was thinking she would have some RS coverage based on her speaking and books, but I couldn't find non-interview RS that covered her or her books. Lots of listings to speak, and some interviews, and some book listings, but nothing that would amount to making the subject notable. (Note: If other editors find something I missed, feel free to ping me!) --Kbabej (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.