Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marginal Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Marginal Man

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

appears to fail WP:MUSIC Ironholds (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for bands. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  17:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - While I believe the article fails WP:BAND, I found a brief mention in and what appears to be a student website here. Neither of these sources appear to show sufficient notability.  ceran  thor  19:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Mere mentions do not qualify under the notability guideline. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep may be a weak case but for coverage there is ; ; all from the one publication. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * All from the one location indeed. Ironholds (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – In addition to the above, I found an article about them in The Morning Call. Given that online sources from 1980s press coverage are limited, it's something that already this much has turned up. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 14:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.