Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margo (soap)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was → speedy keep. The subject is notable and sources were found. Non-admin closure. -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Margo (soap)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN brand of soap, no assertion of notability, borderline spam. Tevildo 17:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, preferably a product will be covered in the article about the company, but two apparently reliable sources turned up in the first five google hits.  --Dhartung | Talk 17:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep more coverage found on Google News Corpx 17:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dhartung and Corpx, maybe create a page on the company. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Corpx and Dhartung this one just needs expansion, the notability is evident. Burntsauce 20:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree it has sources so Keep it. Anybody wanta Snow this discussion. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( tαlk ) 22:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I do, I do :-) -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.