Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margret A. Treiber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Margret A. Treiber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR notability. I couldn't find any significant mentions of her or reviews of her work in reliable sources. The only source in the article is also unreliable - written by a community member not affiliated with the news website. Whisperjanes (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR, as noted by nominator. I searched Google, NYT, JSTOR, ProQuest and Gale for sources, but did not find sources. Z1720 (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Should have been speedied. Covert advertising. No effective references.   scope_creep Talk  10:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the only sourcing is hyper local coverage of the type that is never enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.