Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marguerite Irma Fournier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Marguerite Irma Fournier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not seem to be notable. Being related to someone who is notable does not automatically establish notability for his relatives and friends. Keivan.f Talk 06:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject doesn't appear to have been notable in her own right, and notability is not inherited. PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete marrying a claimant to a defunct throne does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLPPROD might've been possible here - as the sole source is a deadlink (and doesn't seem reliable in any event). In any event - clearly does not pass GNG, nor does the text make clear why she would be independently notable of her (defunct) royal husband.Icewhiz (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * delete hard to say whether this was written as a hoax, a gag, or a remarkable bit of trivia; no sources found.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.