Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margunn Bjørnholt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Margunn Bjørnholt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No proven notability within academics or any other public field. No notable publications. Asav | Talk 09:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep There is enough in the article to meet WP:GNG already. Some of the sources certainly aren't independent, but enough of them are, including significant references to her work in two TIME magazine articles. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 14:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to pass WP:GNG per Eric. Kaldari (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Significant coverage of her in both the Time and Aftenposten articles demonstrate notability. Bjørnholt is also one of the most important advocates for women in Norway as President of both the Norwegian Association for Women's Rights and the Norwegian Women's Lobby.  gobonobo  + c 05:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eric and Passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. I am One of Many (talk) 06:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.