Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mari Aid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Mari Aid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wholly negative BLP about a person who apparently ran a website (article also included in this AFD) that was found guilty of fraud totaling less than €20K. Only sources are in Estonian but they are written by the same journalist in the same newspaper (the only one that is not no longer exists). Neither the person nor the business nor the "crime" meet the notability guidelines. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm tempted to say that we should just speedy the main article because it does read like it was made as an attack page against the woman. I am finding some coverage such as this story, but it's mostly about the crime. So far I don't see where we need two articles as a whole, to be certain. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both. I'd initially found one or two news links, but that seems to be it for the most part. I am fairly aware that most English language search engines do not bring up every result that's out there, but there is a pretty distinct lack of coverage overall. From what I can gather, the website got very little coverage and the woman herself only got coverage in relation to some charges brought against her. She was found guilty, but as a whole it doesn't seem to have received enough coverage to where the crime itself would be enough to keep the article. I'd actually recommend speedying the main article because it comes across as an attack page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * That was my first thought but it seemed rather underhanded given how long they've existed. On the other hand the creator hasn't edited since 2009, so there's that. If another admin wants to do the honors on both of them, I'm jiggy. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm... I can see your point. Do you want to try tagging them and seeing if anyone would be willing to do it? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   02:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Very, very weak delete. While the merger of those articles would certainly be notable (plenty of coverage in the biggest daily newspaper of Estonia, more sources readily available), this tends be WP:NOTNEWS area. -- Sander Säde 16:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.