Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mari Karsikas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Mari Karsikas

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Doesn't seem notable. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 02:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

The article suits here very well. Furthermore, also the Finnish and Swedish Wikipedias have the same article. --Finrus (talk) 02:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC) An article, which is not notable. --Finrus (talk) 09:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * (Has just been proposed for speedy deletion in both Finnish and Swedish Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 10:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC))
 * By the same person aswell, without any "comment".. Speedy deletion removed on swedish, and replaced with relevance-check Evalowyn (talk) 10:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... We are in desperate need of someone who knows Finnish. All refs are in Finnish, and google doesn't give me much else. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 10:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I know Finnish and can verify the refs are correct. I can't say anything about Karsikas's notability yet though. The Finnish article has been nominated for deletion, but no one has actually created the nomination page, so there is no discussion so far. J I P  | Talk 18:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * The references are 1) thesis (Master level) 2&3) "bulk" appoitment news (not editorial news, texts are sent by companies to newspapers). She has worked as journalist before in one of the largest newspapers in Finland and is now working as a editorial director (not editor-in-chief/executive editor) in a monthly lifestyle/women's magazine. She's not public person in Finland. I cannot  see how this could be notable. --Harriv (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Try becoming chief editor first. Geschichte (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, for not having any significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources, per the analysis of Harriv. She has never held a position that would give her right to claim inherent notability either. Arsenikk (talk)  21:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.