Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Bunda Segala bangsa, Nilo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Maumere. v/r - TP 23:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Maria Bunda Segala bangsa, Nilo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article on a statue in Flores, Indonesia. Uncited, and a search reveals no reliable sources to prove notability per the General Notability Guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Needs to be renamed, but does appear to be a fairly significant pilgrimage site and a pretty prominent statue. Widening the search using the English translations as well does produce some more information. Nothing hugely significant, but I would say enough to keep the article as a stub, which is perfectly acceptable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  —Necrothesp (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Such as? Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Such as what? Information? Do a Google search. That will confirm its existence. After that it's a judgement call as to whether it's notable or not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:MUSTBESOURCES and WP:EXIST. Saying that sources exist is generally not considered enough; linking to them would be a much better approach, while saying that something is proven to exist does not make it notable by default. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said, it's a judgement call as to whether it's notable or not. I've made that call, so have you. Remember nothing on Wikipedia is usually set in stone. Too many editors now make the mistake of assuming everything is governed by rules. Not true. If it was, we wouldn't be having AfD debates. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * True, if everything was set in stone AfD would have been disbanded, as once proposed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete noting there is a church not statue of the same name. no significant coverage . LibStar (talk) 04:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge/Delete. If it can be merged with Maumere then it would be better than deleting it. If it can't be merged, I agree with deleting it. Rxlxm (talk) 00:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.