Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Checa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994. WP:SNOWCLOSE (non-admin closure) &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 06:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Maria Checa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP1E applies and that is so undue that this looks like. A vio. InDeqauately sourced anyway. Fails gng if it lasts that ling Spartaz Humbug! 00:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect: to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994. Most of the info is already there, not enough in this to justify a separate article. Vrac (talk) 03:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Vrac. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Vrac.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Vrac. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Vrac. When I did much of the work four years ago in listifying the entries for minimally or non-notable playmates, I left some marginal articles in place for future decision. It's more than time for this one. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge & then Redirect to List_of_Playboy_Playmates_of_1994 - Without having done a large amount of research on the subject under discussion here myself, there does not appear to be enough notability for a stand-alone article at this time. Guy1890 (talk) 05:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.