Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Devigili


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Maria Devigili

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't believe it meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG; can't find any significant coverage; no major awards for her work; doesn't seem to have charted anywhere; happy days, LindsayHello 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. happy days, LindsayHello 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Updated LindsayHello Please forgive me for misdirected words. I am adding many new and also current links to newspaper, radio, and online coverage of Ms Devigili's Career. I look forward to updating Maria Devigili Wiki Page to suit the guidelines you will kindly help me resolve.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rxeno (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 07:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Added a complete rewrite of the history/story. Will follow up with reference updates and links cleaning. --- rxeno  03:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Cleaned up exposed url/links. Adding rewrites in the next days. Thank you for any input. --- rxeno  09:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The article is a mess and needs to be cleaned up - especially the many URLs throughout the article - however it has some potential if it can be tagged as needing work. --Micky (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.