Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Eriksson (supercentenarian)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Swedish supercentenarians. Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Maria Eriksson (supercentenarian)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough for a standalone article as per WP:GNG in my opinion - no significant coverage in reliable sources and lived to the age of "only" 110... she was the oldest person in a (relatively small) nation but hundreds of people have lived longer. The only thing making her notable is her status as "former Sweden's oldest person" but other people who have held this distinction don't have articles themselves. I propose this article is either deleted or merged with List of Swedish supercentenarians and a mini biography is added to it, like there is at List of British supercentenarians, List of French supercentenarians, etc, in line with WP:PAGEDECIDE. Ollie231213 (talk) 16:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Swedish supercentenarians. There's nothing worth merging (which would entail expanding the existing tables there). Clarityfiend (talk) 02:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for reasons stated by Ollie.  O s c a r L  22:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:N's requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable third-party sources. Canadian   Paul  16:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I have no particular opinion on the delete/keep axis, but if it is going to be deleted (which seems like a done deal), at least provide a hat note at Maria_Eriksson pointing to List of Swedish supercentenarians -- RoySmith (talk) 13:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.