Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Fowler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Maria Fowler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability reasons and at least one source has been deemed as unusable (Digital Spy) Jamesbuc (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  17:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  17:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  17:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  17:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of reliable sources including BBC, Radio Times etc. Also clear WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 19:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG with featured non-trivial coverage in secondary sources. The article and the references are in need of formatting, not deletion Wm335td (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Im not sure how it meets WP:GNG as none of the sources provide significant content and some of the others are more about or is information based around the Samaritans and not Maria herself. Jamesbuc (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your idea of 'significant' is far more than is required in the guidelines at WP:GNG and, perhaps more approriately, WP:BASIC. Coverage in numerous national publications, full articles on her, including in the BBC News and the Standard. Boleyn (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to The Only Way Is Essex, as that is the only thing she is known for - just having a job is not notable - the references are run-of-the-mill for someone who has appeared on TV (WP:MILL) - she hasn't actually done anything notable, no major roles or awards (sorry about her depression and suicide attempt) - no evidence that she meets WP:NACTOR - Epinoia (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The refs are good, satisfies GNG and BASIC. Szzuk (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.