Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Giuseppa Robucci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ‑Scottywong | gab _ 16:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Maria Giuseppa Robucci

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article and sources do not assert notability beyond reaching an advanced age: she was born, had children, got very old, chopped wood, broke a hip, and died. This lady's placement in our List of Italian supercentenarians is sufficient (with a redirect on her name). — JFG talk 23:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * For clarity, as an WP:ATD, I advocate a redirect to the Italian list without merging any trivia about her life. — JFG talk 19:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - sustained significant coverage over the course of 15+ years. It doesn't matter why she's notable, just that she is notable. Once she is deemed to be notable, then a basic biography of her life is warranted, and there's more than enough info for a stand-alone biography. schetm (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2019(UTC)
 * She did NOT have "15 years" of WP:SIGCOV. There was one short feature for her 100th birthday, as is extremely common, and over 10 years later she got some WP:ROUTINE oldster coverage over a few years. There is nothing notable about her that doesn't fit snuggly in a list entry. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NOPAGE and WP:GNG. Only received routine oldster feature coverage. Just the typical fluff born, married, had kids, longevity secret, random undefined factoid chopped wood until a certain age, died. Her list entry at List of Italian supercentenarians and elsewhere is enough. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - There's a lot of room for interpretation of WP:NOPAGE and WP:ROUTINE. Even though it is common for subjects like this to receive coverage on their 100th birthday, reaching 100 is extraordinary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talk • contribs)


 * Delete or Redirect to appropriate list per WP:NOPAGE and WP:PERMASTUB. Sources are routine birthday articles and don't tell us much more than the usual longevity nothingness of born, got married, had kids, got old, died. Entry on a list is enough. CommanderLinx (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Schetm. 71.161.233.35 (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing of encyclopedic value here. And while I hope (but don't expect) to live to a hundred, that's not a claim for notability. In my eyes, there's no notability, but even if there were, WP:NOPAGE comes into play, because there's nothing of interest to present that cannot be presented in a list article. Remember, notability is a necessary condition for having a stand-alone article, but it's not sufficient. --Randykitty (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I would be inclined to favor a keep, considering her age of 116 and her coverage on the media. Garlicolive (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no policy or guideline that the "oldest x" is notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Meets WP:SIGCOV. 45.228.209.44 (talk) 08:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Agreed it meets WP:SIGCOV. "Once she is deemed to be notable, then a basic biography of her life is warranted, and there's more than enough info for a stand-alone biography" as per schetm.  -  Ret.Prof (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the Italian language media coverage from WP:RSs provides further information of a notable nature - at the time of her death was the oldest person in Europe (so more than just a very old person) and was in 2011 the oldest mayor of an Italian town.--Goldsztajn (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no policy or guideline that the "oldest x" is notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep She meets WP:SIGCOV. Drunk in Paris (talk) 08:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Italian supercentenarians. She's clearly notable enough to be mentioned in some detail there, but the coverage she did receive will never be more than a couple short paragraphs. Perfect for a minibio, that list isn't overly long, and merging won't lead to any loss of meaningful content (i.e. there's no reason to list the names of her non-notable children). The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 19:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Although the majority support keeping this article (along with one merge) it is clear we have no consensus, nor are we likly to get one. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe I spoke too soon! - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:GNG requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources". While some sources cited in the article absolutely do not represent WP:SIGCOV, some of these do (even before her death that was widely reported), The Local, Corriere della Sera , FoggiaToday, a branch of Citynews (Italy) , a newspaper La Gazzetta di San Severo , and I am sure more if some did a deeper dive. She was even noticed by Guinness World Records ]! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.