Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Lewis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Maria Lewis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsanctioned profile with false and liable information Gretz2471 (talk) 12:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, pending some explanation of what is "false and liable" about this article. Wikipedia articles are not "sanctioned".- gadfium 05:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: It certainly needs to be edited for tone and sourcing, since parts of it are extremely promotional and it relies on things like Linkedin and an interview with what looks to be a dating game show. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Adequate third party coverage, does need cleanup, though.   Montanabw (talk)  07:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Considerable, non-trivial coverage in secondary sources in the article already. Google news also has plenty of hits for her . And ; what's this about "unsanctioned"? Nobody needs to sanction an article for it to exist. As to Libel, if there's something in the article that shouldn't be there, then remove it per WP:BLP. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.