Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Maldonado (Miss Kentucky)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Maria Maldonado (Miss Kentucky)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Only one reference does more than barely mention her, and that one is just a report of a talk she gave. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources of Miss Kentucky victory Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. Flat Out (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as I have just overhauled the article, significantly expanding prose and sourcing, and the subject is the focus of coverage by reliable third-party sources over a significant period. I would invite the nominator and any interested editor to review the article in its current state. - Dravecky (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Dravecky's sources and improvements to the article. Ejgreen77 (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per wide area sourcing and the fact the state pageant is a feeder to Miss America. Generally state winners of major beauty pageants are kept because of all the publicity -- I would have been amazed if plenty of sources couldn't have been found. Wikipedia's category hierarchy for such winners goes down to state level.  Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 11:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.