Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Nassali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Maria Nassali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I am painfully cognisant of systematic bias, that is by no means an excuse for a non-notable article to exist. Her books are held in 201 libraries, not very wide at all. Other coverage, like this is passing and of questionable reliability. While she does seem to be decently widely published, I've not found indication that her work is widely covered or impactful enough to convey notability by itself. Otherwise seems to be a fail of WP:NBIO and WP:GNG Eddie891 Talk Work 01:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.