Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Ogedengbe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Maria Ogedengbe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable artist, with referencing that fails on many levels.

Fiddle  Faddle  13:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  ——  Serial  14:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nom's analysis of the existing sources. I have searched for better sources, but didn't find any proper independent coverage apart from Wikipedia mirror sites - a few interviews, a few things she'd written herself, a few mentions on webpages of projects she was affiliated with, that sort of thing. Seems to fail GNG. Girth Summit  (blether)  14:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I had also endorsed the initial PROD, as a search did not find SIGCOV or relevant accomplishments to meet NARTIST.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * For the record, and in the interests of transparency, I created this page per this discussion; but as it was merely a technical edit I don't think it affects my judgement. Which is that the nominator's analysis of the current sourcing is superlative, and the results of my WP:BEFORE clearly matches theirs and other !voters. There's nothing approaching meeting WP:ANYBIO, with none of the requirements of WP:BASIC being close to met. For the bot, Delete. ——  Serial  15:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete What can be found on the web is what is given as sourcing in the article; and it does not amount to sufficient sourcing to satisfy WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. Absent better coverage, the artist fails notability requirements. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and subject failing WP:NARTIST. Kudos to nominator for doing an in-depth assessment of sources for other editors to view. --Kbabej (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete mostly per nom and analysis therein. My search revealed a few more arts-and-culture announcements from the Kansans City Star, but no significant coverage.  I'd give the first source listed as "weak" counting toward GNG given the prose that is outside the interview, but that is one source, and so the topic does not appear to pass GNG or WP:CREATIVE.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note I note this reverted edit from criticising the analysis of the references. The place to put that is in these comments, but I put that down to inexperience. Out of fairness I wish us to consider that edit as contributing to this discussion even though it broke the rules by refactoring another's comments  Fiddle   Faddle  13:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The original creator was - the subject's initials and art qualification at the time. It's a promotional autobiography. Guy (help! - typo?) 14:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.