Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Rizzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Maria Rizzo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a school board trustee and a municipal councillor in a suburb — neither of which is a claim of notability that gets a person over WP:NPOL. But the article doesn't provide any compelling evidence that she's any more notable than the norm for those positions — everything this article either describes or sources is completely standard and normal stuff that's not even slightly out of the ordinary for a school board trustee or a suburban municipal councillor. All local political figures generate at least this much coverage in the local media, so such coverage is purely WP:ROUTINE if it doesn't demonstrate a compelling reason why she would warrant permanent coverage in an international encyclopedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete The most generous conclusion would be WP:TOOSON. When this politician is elected to a national-level office, it will be time for a WP article. LaMona (talk) 22:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 14:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Per above, possibly a victim of WP:TOOSOON. BenLinus1214 (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.