Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Snyder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- Cheers, Ri l ey  ''' 01:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Maria Snyder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extensive totally promotional article, but unfortunately none of the references support any of the stated facts or establish notability. No articles link to this subject. The Eco stuff leads to citations of her participating in conferences, and her characters being chosen for a charity promotion, but no editorial content establishing notability - sorry. It needs a total rewrite with actual references to live on WP - they might exist but I don't find them in a google search. NYTimes does mention that she graced a runway long ago, but that's about it. Fails WP:ANYBIO miserably. Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The article should be subtantively rewritten, as I agree it is very promotional, even in the lede. But I think she has a big enough profile to keep a wiki article - there are articles written about her in NY Times and Huffington Post for instance, and has been noted for her eco-fashion work. thedropsoffire|talk —Preceding undated comment added 05:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public)  talk   00:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. It needs work but these establish notability: The New York Times, Post & Courier, Milwaukee Journal, The Jersey Journal''. --Michig (talk) 07:20, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.