Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria gallifuoco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Maria gallifuoco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable blogger with no secondary sources.Google turns up no significant coverage beyond blogs etc., which is odd for a "media personality". Harry the Dog WOOF  10:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I haven't found any reliable third-party sources to establish notability, despite searching with both Google US and Google Australia. It is possible that my Google Australia results may have missed something but I slightly doubt it. My last resort, using Google search, also provided nothing reliable, unsurprisingly. Considering that any Twitter or Facebook user could be a blogger, she is not any different. Maria Gallifuoco is not notable to Wikipedia standards at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  20:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete – I agree with Harry the Dog, despite her alleged 28,000 followers, she is a blogger and has not achieved any notable status. Initial searches on Google revealed that she has never been mentioned in any reliable media and her fame is limited to social media websites like Facebook and Pinterest. These are not classed as reliable sources by Wikipedia and do not denote notability BarkingNigel (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ADVERT. Looks entirely promotional. Qworty (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:ADVERT with serious notability issues. -- WikHead (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. — ΛΧΣ  21™  21:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.