Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah Haberman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Mariah Haberman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Haberman was not even Miss Wisconsin, being that would not make her notable, but being a contender even less so. The sources on her show are either local chamber of commerce press releases, or the alumni magazine from her college, these are not what we look for as reliable sources. The Huff Po blog article on her and her Miss Wisconsin role is so non-reliable it says she was Miss Wisconsin, which is just not true. My search for additional sources came up with more blogs, her webpage, and maybe another local chamber of commerce press release, but nothing at all that was a reliable source. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Her notability is for being a television host, not for her involvement in the Miss Wisconsin pagent. The HuffPo must have made a typo since she won a local "Miss Wisconsin Central" pagent not the state. They missed the word Central. Google has many hits for her. There are hundreds of trivial mentions of her recording for the show at a locale and it's hard to wade through all of them to find the reliable ones about her. I don't see the HuffPo article as being unreliable just because they missed one word in it. I added another television station's article about her and much more content. She has written several newspaper articles for USA Today-Wisconsin such as .  Royal broil  03:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The HuffPo article is still from the blog section, which does not have editorial oversight and so cannot count as a reliable source, period. The UW Oshkosh source is a college paper source, not worthwhile. Another source is local coverage of her beauty pageant career. The one added source actually helps us see how the whole coverage of her in the article is over stated. She is a host of the mentioned show, not the host. Beyond this, this is a 4 paragraph article not about her, or giving significant coverage of her. It is a feel good promotional local radio/TV article about how the town is getting covered in the show, add in that this is Haberman's home town. A total of 0 or these sources meet the requirement of reliable, secondary 3rd party sources. Haberman writing in some way for USA today in no way adds towards her passing GNG. She is just totally non-notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect and merge to Discover Wisconsin where he limited notability lies.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.