Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah Lopez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn due to sourcing improvements. Bearcat (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Mariah Lopez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an activist, which is resting mostly on unreliable sourcing — of the four references here, #2 and #4 are gutted as blogsourcing, while #1 glancingly namechecks her existence in the process of failing to be about her. #3 ain't so bad, admittedly — she's not the primary topic of the article, but she features in it prominently enough for it to be worth something — but one decent source isn't enough to get a person over WP:GNG by itself if all of the other sources are blogs and namechecks. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if an improved volume of good sourcing shows up. Bearcat (talk) 03:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, clearly notable and the sourcing seems sufficient. Skyerise (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable needs help with length of article and more sources. I added some but can use more. Jooojay (talk) 02:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, this has had some sourcing added since I first nominated this. Nomination withdrawn. Bearcat (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.