Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marian Gaston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies. as a viable ATD with the history preserved should her status change. Star  Mississippi  14:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Marian Gaston

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:JUDGE. Failed judicial nominees aren't inherently notable, WP:BIO1E applies. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law,  and California. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify until renomination. I don't understand what makes her a "failed" nominee all of a sudden. So she hasn't been renominated within the first five days of her nomination being sent back, and....? Snickers2686 (talk) 03:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify per the above. BD2412  T 04:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep in keeping with the spirit of WOMRED, let's see if her nomination regains traction. Wl219 (talk) 01:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Appears that her nomination has been withdrawn at her request. I'd be fine with redirecting this to Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies as a WP:ATD. Let&#39;srun (talk) 04:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect the page "Marian Gatson" to Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies, as her litigation record and opposition to her nomination are substantive, while the fact she withdrew herself means she's no longer a nominee and not notable enough to merit her own article. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.