Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianne Dimain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  21:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Marianne Dimain

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant roles in multiple television productions. Does not satisfy WP:BIO either, as there's little coverage in reliable third-party sources. ƒ(Δ)² 17:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as meeting the qualifications of WP:ENTERTAINER which specifically includes "Actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities". The guidelines of WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER are not mutually exclusive as both fall under the guiding principles of WP:BIO and WP:GNG. If a journalist is also a television journalist, he becomes a television personality and/or opinion-maker and may be judged by both or either subordinate criteria, or we may simply swim back upstream to BIO or GNG. MichaelQSchmidt (talk)
 * Delete. There is no article here. ENT does not make anyone on television notable. There is nothing here to establish notability, and ENT doesn't cover journalists unless they do entertainment journalism. Clear fail of CREATIVE here. Lara  17:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Struck my keep above. Further research shows that while this individual might tenatively be seen as possibly notable to the Filipino community in Canada, , , , there is not yet enough to allow her meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO. When she receives greater recognition and coverage, the article might be expanded and welcomed back. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.