Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Andrée Beauchemin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Marie-Andrée Beauchemin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:BIO and WP:DIPLOMAT. nothing in gnews, and gbooks merely confirms her role or her making comments as a goverment spokesperson. nothing about her as the subject. LibStar (talk) 07:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Like most permanent ambassadors, she attracted significant coverage in reliable sources due to her prestigious and influential position. In 2000 she caused a minor controversy in Cairo when she painted her official residence (a former palace) pink, an event which was was reported on by the Cairo Times. The coverage doesn't appear to be on-line, but is described here. Several sources, including that one, describe her important role in the Omar Khadr affair when she was High Commissioner to Pakistan. She's also published scholarly articles about international relations. Pburka (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 16:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.