Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Louise Vanherk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Marie-Louise Vanherk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Had been DE-PRODed, doesn't pass WP:GNG. None of the current sources are significant in-depth coverage. WP:BEFORE not turning up good sources. Zero hits in Google News. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. I was the one that prodded it. My WP:BEFORE did not turn up WP:GNG passing sources. – Novem Linguae (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - ambassadors aren't presumptively notable, and I'm not finding any coverage on this one aside from scattered trivial coverage. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Indepth coverage is not available. Fails GNG. Purosinaloense T/K 10:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Diplomats are not automatically handed an "inherent" notability freebie just because they exist — to be notable enough for inclusion, a diplomat has to be able to clear WP:GNG on her sourceability. But that's not what's on offer here: five of the six footnotes are primary sources (government press releases, a photograph) that are not support for notability at all, and the only one that actually represents journalistic reportage isn't about her, it just namechecks her existence as a spokesperson for somebody else. These aren't the kind of sources we're looking for. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.