Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Casimire Catherine, Comtesse de Saulx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Marie Casimire Catherine, Comtesse de Saulx
NN bio. Looks impressive on the surface, but fails Google test and perhaps NPOV historical importance. (I have concerns with some of the other obscure bios this editor is adding, but not really sure why. Quite odd. Anyway, let's see how this one fares in AFD) Clappingsimon talk 12:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Fails WP:NN and WP:Bio, and looks like OR. Dionyseus 13:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I removed the speedy tag, because A7 just doesn't apply here. While it may be a complete hoax, AfD is much better at sorting that out than summary deletion.  "Notability is not a criterion for deletion". AdamBiswanger1 13:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Possibly Weak keep - probably a better solution is to Merge somewhere but don't ask me where. The book being referenced does exist - see . He husband also existed . I'd like some more evidence but on the face of it she seems barely notable.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  17:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete although not for any reason give above. My assumption (and not having the cited reference, it is only an assumption), is that this is a copyvio. Turpilo was and Claudius Marius Victor probably comes from the same place. The subject did exist, but was not much more notable than any other randomly selection Versailles parasite; her husband was vaguely notable, but the article isn't about him. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.