Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Porter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Marie Porter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominated for deletion under WP:GNG. Individual is not a significant or important figure in any of the fields cited. Article lacks reliable, independent sources. The bulk of the cited references are from the individual's own website or from press releases issued by the individual's company. Throwie1999 (talk) 02:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  02:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:44, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep The article needs some work. But the Macleans source, the Citybeat article, and other sources show that has been covered substantially in reliable independent sources for various aspects of her career. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.