Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Porter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 07:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Marie Porter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTABILITY Not only does the page read as an advertisement but the sources are mostly from her own personal website. Also, the secondary sources do not make this person notable at all. If this article passes notability standards than that would mean that every single baker in the world with a small write up in the local news needs/deserves a Wikipedia biography. Orasis (talk) 01:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I'm not finding anything that satisfies WP:GNG. An appearance on the TV show MasterChef is far from enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and : the article doesn't demonstrate notability.  INeverCry   21:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.