Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marija Brenčič Jelen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Thanks everyone for contributing and please remember to assume good faith with my closure. If you want to discuss undeleting this article, please request it at deletion review, not on my talk page. Thanks! SarahStierch (talk) 02:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Marija Brenčič Jelen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dubious whether this poet from Slovenia meets the WP:CREATIVE guideline. Eleassar my talk 20:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Article needs improvement not deletion. Hmlarson (talk) 03:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I will improve an article, when I have time. Let you await, let you have tollerance. I have sources in Slovenian Wikipedia.--91.148.67.172 (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For the article to be kept, it must be shown that the person it discusses meets at least one of the criteria at WP:CREATIVE. --Eleassar my talk 22:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No mention in Google Books and many of the sources used in the article are not good. The sources in the Slovenian wiki don't look very good either though maybe I am wrong. Seems strange there is nothing online such as an obituary. -- GreenC  08:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.