Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marijuana Anonymous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus and article's improvement. diff. PeaceNT 04:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Marijuana Anonymous

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no secondary source to assert notability, Google news search found nothing related to this organization. WooyiTalk to me? 16:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article can even be construed as an advertisement for the site. Corpx 18:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * keep per, . Plenty of sources seem to exist, this meets our inclusion standards. --W.marsh 19:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep —  Over 66, 000 hits on 4 major search engines. ~ Magnus animuM  BRAIN FREEZE! 21:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a legitimate organization similar to Alcoholics Anonymous, the article now provides reliable sources to that effect. Burntsauce 18:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * IMO, the reason why this organization cannot be developed to the scale of AA is that marijuana is not addictive in nature, and no one has ruined their life because of marijuana. However, if sources are enough I am willing to withdraw the nomination. WooyiTalk to me? 20:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and for the "citation" sorry about making uncited claims. I don't use marijuana, but I know many others who do and none is addicted. It's anecdotal evidence, I guess. WooyiTalk to me? 19:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Notable. Many google hits and many archived news articles. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Marijuana+Anonymous%22 --daveh4h 21:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as legitimate as Narcotics Anonymous.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 04:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep because DO BONGS Jerkcity 05:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.