Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marijuana policy of the Donald Trump administration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SK1; nominator was unaware of WP:PM and proposes a merge, not deletion. Potental merges can be discussed there. The Bushranger One ping only 06:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Marijuana policy of the Donald Trump administration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article largely covers a single press conference and three states' response to that single press conference. It the topic is noteworthy but not deserving of its own article. There are single articles for the administration's policy on immigration and the economy, but a separate one for marijuana? Seems rather silly to me. The content should be stripped down and merged into Social policy of Donald Trump. Instaurare (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, perhaps it's a dumb question, but if the content should be stripped down and merged, why are you proposing a deletion instead of a formal merge? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:31, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I may be the dumb one. I have seen many AfDs where merge was the final result, so I didn't know there was a formal merge process. Instaurare (talk) 03:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Speedy keep CRIT 1, nominator is proposing a merger, not deletion (or redirection). Galobtter (talk) 06:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: a quick Google search shows that this is clearly notable for a standalone page. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.  I'll add them where necessary.  Janet-O (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Even the nominator seems to think so "It the topic is noteworthy but not deserving of its own article." and seems to be only proposing a merger, which is why I !voted speedy keep. Galobtter (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep or Merge as per above. Octoberwoodland (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.