Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marin Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy closed as an invalid deletion rationale. No prejudice against the initiation of a new discussion at another time if somebody can come up with a substantive reason why we should consider deletion, but that's not what this reason is. Bearcat (talk) 19:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Marin Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Please remove this page as previously entered information is not sufficient. Also, a lot of the information from third-party resources has been deleted and I am not understanding why. I have tried multiple times to add the information I have and would just like this page to be deleted as the information I enter ends up being deleted shortly after I hit "save." There is ample information that was published in regards to the magazine on the page's inception that has since been deleted. Thank you. MarinFan14 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy KEEP  it's not a valid reason for deletion?Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Not a valid reason for deletion. And you need to learn the difference between a reliable source and a primary one if you think the information you've been trying to add has been deleted for no reason. And you don't get to claim ownership rights over the article just because you're its original creator, either — once you've ceased to be the only person who has ever edited the article, you don't get to claim any special veto over whether it continues to exist or not. It belongs to the Wikipedia community, not to you, and will be kept or deleted based on our content rules. Keep — in fact, speaking as an administrator I'm acting to immediately close this as an invalid nomination. Any content issues can be discussed on the article's talk page, and a new discussion can always be initiated at a later date if somebody else can come up with a substantive reason for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 19:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.