Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Ōno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America1000 20:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Marina Ōno

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

ANN role analysis:

1) Oruphaliru Redspirit (Eien no Aselia - main)

2) Faury Carat (Aoi Umi no Tristia - main) -

With only two main roles, and neither of the productions the subject's been in are notable, Marina is not notable enough to warrant her own article. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 10:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  SST  flyer  12:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment If it were strictly by anime/manga, then no, but her biography on JA wikipedia is fairly sizable and sourced; she has lots of roles in the adult video game industry and as a gravure/AV? model, so those criteria should be checked. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * JP wiki does not state Marina as an AV model, unlike Sola Aoi. AV models, as far as I'm concerned, need to have at least won an award for their pornographic work before they're considered to be notable. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 23:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.