Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Hedman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding "delete" !vote per WP:IAR and per sources added. OrenBochman, if you wish to discuss this further then you can renominate or I can reopen this AFD. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Marina Hedman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Biography of porn performer, sourced only to IMDB and something called the "European Girls Adult Film Database". I have removed the unsourced material and doubt sources can be found to satisfy WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - after rescue by cavaronne, seems like she passes the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW and lack of WP:BEFORE. Not an anonymous "porn performer" but an easily sourcable actress, active in genre films, auteur films and pornograhic films, in which she is recognized by many reliable sources as the first/one of the first stars in Italian industry. Passes our general notability guideline and multiple specific guidelines. Cavarrone (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as it stands this is a WP:PORNBIO and not a WP:N one. As far as I can see it is also a WP:BLP without a WP:RS. If the porn section is removed or significantly reduced, I might be induced to reconsider whether if it passes WP:GNG BO ; talk 21:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The guidelines are not exclusive of each other. You don't disregard WP:N simply because an article qualifies for consideration under a more specific guideline. So all of those references, you can confirm that none of published books are RS? Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this vote... anyway 1)This is not "a WP:BLP without a WP:RS" 2)She is not just a pornographic actress 3)if even we should consider her just as pornographic actress, she passes PORNBIO#3, "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" 4)as said above, as it is obvious, guidelines are not exclusive of each other 5)it seems you vote "delete" when an actress passes PORNBIO as she does not pass GNG and "delete" when an actress passes GNG as she does not pass PORNBIO. Bad faith? Cavarrone (talk) 05:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome to my opinion - though there is much more to discuss this Afd discussion, this is no longer a discussion for me - it has denigrated to a personal attack despite my good will to compromise. BO ; talk 11:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * keep - passes GNG. sure its a porn actress but still..--BabbaQ (talk) 09:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Withdraw - Thanks to Cavaronne for sourcing this. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.