Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Jacoby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Marina Jacoby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable, independent sources conform WP:RS The Banner talk 19:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  19:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep: There are plenty of other sources that confirm she is Miss Nicaragua 2016, so I really don't think sources are the problem. The question is whether this is sufficient to meet the WP:ANYBIO criterion "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor". I weakly suppose that it is. ubiquity (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You have also WP:ONEEVENT as Miss Nicaragua is in fact a preliminary round for Miss Universe. The Banner talk 21:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Miss Nicaragua alone isn't enough to warrant coverage, per WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. If all the info you can provide in an article is that she won something, you don't have an article. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Numerous in-depth sources here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now as the consensus is going to Keep it seems and this is not seriously needed for deletion especially if there are any future improvements (even if she currently questionable for better independent notability). SwisterTwister   talk  05:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.