Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariner Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Mariner Software

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The topic company fails WP:NCORP requirements. References can be found for the software but none provide in-depth information and Independent Content on the topic company as required by WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND  HighKing++ 12:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  HighKing++ 12:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article with a history of WP:SPA edits. The article text and references are effectively a list of their software lines. Searches find announcement-based coverage of past acquisitions (e.g. ) and the use of the company as an example in an article on teleworking, but I am not seeing the level of coverage of the firm itself needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 09:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.