Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariner Write

Mariner Write

 * This is an advertisement. Article was listed as a copyvio, but the site owner gave permission for the text to be used. Article was then listed for speedy deletion, but it doesn't qualify: see Spam, which says it must go through VfD. If someone wants to rewrite it as a real article, that would be great. Otherwise, delete.-gadfium (talk) 04:12, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * delete ~ mlk &#9993; &#9836;  04:20, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) ~
 * I've cleaned up the advertising talk, which leaves a very small compu-stub. Not sufficiently notable for my tastes, but I'm aware that others have less strict requirments. Delete.  --fvw *  04:22, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
 * Delete Macs suck anyway. &mdash;ExplorerCDT 07:33, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, now just another computer stub waiting for someone to expand it. Dan100 09:30, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Being anti-Borg, I like alternatives, but that doesn't affect my Wikipedia voting--apparently this software was voted "MacHome Magazine's Application of the Month", nominated for Best Productivity Application at the 2003 MacUser-UK Awards, and touted as one of the "best alternatives to Microsoft Word" in MacWorld Magazine--once we start talking awards, I think software becomes notable. Niteowlneils 17:20, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: not an article, still an advert. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:03, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, should have been speedied as spam. Wyss 22:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Neutral &mdash; I have originally nominated it for speedy deletion as an advertisement masquerading as article  (&ldquo;Boasting an elegant and easy-to-use interface, Mariner Write can run on only 2MB of RAM. And that's no typo; only 38 MB less than Word®!&rdquo; etc.) but now after fvw has rewritten it, it is no longer spam, so I won&rsquo;t vote Delete. If the above informations about awards were in the article I would vote Keep. I&rsquo;ll comment the content in Talk:Mariner Write. Rafa&#322; Pocztarski 17:29, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)