Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariners Mania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 09:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Mariners Mania
Seems like promotion by User: Crushed Optimism. Does not satisfy WP:WEB, so far as I can tell. As a Mariners fan, I have never heard of this site. C S (Talk) 01:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Somehow, I imagine that the majority of notable fansites would at least have up to date information on the standings. The Mariners may have been postponed the last 4 or so days in Cleveland, but they've still played at least 3 games. --Evan Seeds ( talk )( contrib. ) 01:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, at first glance, it appears to violate WP:SPAM, but I'd say WP:WEB is also a violation. --Cremepuff222  ( talk,  review me! ,  ??? ) 01:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, because I would like to learn more about this. Best, --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 17:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; fails WP:WEB. As always, would reconsider if additional evidence were offered.  --ElKevbo 21:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per ElKebo. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 21:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete but I'd be more comfortable if others looked at it. DGG 04:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.