Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Cerrito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The SPAs aside, the consensus here is that this is simply WP:TOOSOON. No prejudice is inferred against recreation at a later date when notability can be verified through reliable sources. The Bushranger One ping only 09:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Mario Cerrito

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, only local news coverage. Nothing helpful found via Google. Huon (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - Seems the type who might become notable soon, but possible future notability can't carry the day today. BennyHillbilly (talk) 06:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Are not "local coverage" NJ.com is the state of New Jerseys, news website and subject has been covered in it more then a few times (via google.) Mario Cerrito should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikePlant1 (talk • contribs) 08:06, April 1, 2014 (UTC) — MikePlant1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Subject should not be deleted. After reading guidelines about notability, subject meets them. Also, subject seems to be multi faceted. His references, NJ.com,
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)




 * KEEP Read references and they are legitimate per criteria of notability on wikipedia. Has worked with notable Renoly Santiago on project. I vote keep it, seems there will be a lot more to read about him in the future as well. With a notable start and valid references its ready. Lot more to this guy then pages like this have.....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Ellis_(author)CaliforniaWave (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC) — CaliforniaWave (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by RedNecker13 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 9 April 2014 — RedNecker13 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Not sure what Huon was talking about, I read this and it seems notable. Subject has clout. Keep.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)






 * Delete without prejudice. With respects to the SPA "keeps" above... yes, Mario is just beginning to have mentions in reliable sources, but per WP:GNG (and WP:PEOPLE) an article on Mario is simply a bit TOO SOON. Notability is dependent on a longer career, more prominent projects, a cult following, or far more coverage. Let his works get out there and gain wider coverage and the article might well be worthy of a return. But not quite yet. Sorry.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:05, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.