Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Kart Nintendo Wii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete by (log). Gzkn 06:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Mario Kart Nintendo Wii

 * — (View AfD)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Mario Kart Wii most likely had similar content, and that page has been deleted and protected. &mdash;The Gr e at Llamamoo? 00:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, the article is just speculation.  Hagerman ( talk ) 01:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the arrow of time. It's even couched as speculative by the interviewee. Current text may have reached the quotation tipping point into a copyvio.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: And I think we need some policy on not dragging these rumoured crystal ball Wii games through AfD. Kind Regards -  Heligoland  |   Talk  |   Contribs  01:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wouldn't even be a good stub. Grouse 01:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per Articles for deletion/Mario Kart Wii (2nd nomination). I tagged it as db-repost. Gzkn 01:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note also that the article's creator has been blocked indefinitely as a vandal only account. Gzkn 01:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per nom TSO1D 01:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete While I have no doubt that there will be a Mario Kart game for the Wii, it has not been announced yet. TJ Spyke 02:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Kbjb 03:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Staxringold talkcontribs 03:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyvio, crystalballing and OR. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  03:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The nomination summed up my point well enough. Sharkface217 04:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.