Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Parodi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Mario Parodi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems to fail WP:ARTIST though there does seem to be DVD's avalible from Amazon is this the same person and is it enougth? Wintonian (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please check the concervatoria about Mario Parodi...than you'll see, that this info is correct; Taco Groen (line re-added after user removed the the request.) --Wintonian (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Article also seems to have been speedyed before. --Wintonian (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This is an awkward one. This is the classical guitarist whose heyday appears to have been the '60s rather than the more recent film actor. As he pre-dates the internet, sources are most likely to be in paper form though I found an article about him in an online Argentine guitar magazine and a review of one of his albums in the Gramophone archives (dated November 1970). Browsing the internet, it seems that he has at least two vinyl LPs (remember them!) released by a notable (at that time) label, Music for Pleasure so on the face of it, he would meet WP:MUSICBIO #5, 'has released two or more albums on a major label' but sources are very hard to find.  Perhaps a stub article would be OK for now to give it time to grow?  --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for digging that up, I wasn't at all sure what to do with the article so put it up for discussion more that deletion. I think I am inclined to agree with you if a major label is/ was involved (Policy doesn’t specify whether this has to be a current label) then a stub might work until/ if paper sources can be found and referenced accordingly. But what do other people think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintonian (talk • contribs) 01:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - per the comment by Malcolm above. The article would then need extensive cleanup, if not a complete overhaul. It would also be necessary to differentiate him from the actor of the same name. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 03:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 03:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added some small sources. I think more can be found and dug up about him. I mean, there are enough examples of his music out there. Silver  seren C 03:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There seems to be some coverage of him. So many news sources don't archive that far back, plus most coverage may not be in English at all, so finding it is a chore.  From what Malcolm has said though, it seems notable to me.   D r e a m Focus  07:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.