Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marioism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   deleted as garbage. DS (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Marioism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced. Googling returns nothing. Looks Dubious. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 19:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article creator apparently attributed the creation of this alleged religion to a particular individual, then removed the individual's name. There is no evidence that this religion actually exists whether associated with the individual or not. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This almost meets speedy deletion criteria, as it's impossibly vague (A1. No context.). I find no evidence of notability. Google shows that the word is sometimes used to refer to Super Mario topics, but I'm not sure a redirect is merited. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding anything about this, even in unreliable sources. First Light (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete, hoax or unverifiable, obviously non-notable. Possibly speedy as hoax or db-group. Hairhorn (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.